For City it would be the same old story, renting a ground off a higher body; and surely a long term goal for the club must be the development of a ground to call their own. No doubt Munster hope by that pairing up with City then they'll entice help from the County Council; leading to a communal stadium like that of the Liberty Stadium in Swansea.
It all sounds like a great idea. Plans to play in a 20k+ stadium reflect the City's ambition to play in the biggest games in the country. European football, league wins and cup finals. Also, a partnership between Munster brings the potential of major marketing bucks, perhaps a Musgrave season ticket, which would entice far more people to Cork City games.
In addition to sharing of the stadium would hugely reduce match traffic on the nights when both City and Munster play games in the Airtricity and Magners leagues respectively. While for City it
The return of the terrace would be a massive selling point for City fans. Since the demolition of the Shed and the installation of an all seated stand the atmosphere has taken a major dip. Why stand up for the entire game when you have a seat to sit on? Hopefully in the prospective plans will be a commitment to make these UEFA regulated 'safe standing' areas, like that of the Signal Iduna Park, home to German giants Borussia Dortmund.
So surely you're thinking the first question on City fans lips will be: 'Where do we sign?'
But hold on just a second. Ground sharing is all well and good, but what about four months when both teams are pla
With the bones of a decent football team (Danny Murphy, GearĂ³id Morrissey, Shane Duggan etc) then City's move to Muzzer could have a dramatic effect on the standard of football one sees when going to a Cork City game. Hosting an attractive, entertaining, and successful brand of football is key to getting punters in the gate. What use is having a brand new stadium if nobody wants to watch your team?
Which brings me nicely onto my second point. What use is the
Though this ground-sharing idea seems like a good idea, it has one major flaw. With Munster rugby in decline, and more people being drawn away from local sport towards the bright lights of 'The best league in the world' (According to Andy Gray), it's obvious that despite what members say within FORAS, there will be one group that will always have the largest vote, the punters speaking with their feet.
Kev.
Alright Kev, nice blog...looking forward to the new season now. Think we'll have a decent chance to push on towards the playoffs at least this year. Will probably see you at a couple of the away games...
ReplyDeleteHopefully Joe. It'll be interesting to see how the team shapes up over the pre-season games. Think we'll have to get up this season if we want to get out of the division any time soon.
ReplyDeleteWhat's the point of this redevelopment? Cork City will never need a stadium that big, Turner's Cross will be an ideal size if they get back up to the premier division. Munster already have a 26,000 seat stadium in Limerick, why bother building another, slightly smaller one in Cork?
ReplyDeleteExactly Ciaran. Neither team really needs a stadium that size. The only time City would need it is if they play big European games, but I can't get my head around why Munster would need it
ReplyDelete(Maybe well read Munster fans would be able to explain why...)
Fair play mate, nice blog.
ReplyDeleteKeep up the good work.
All the best for the current season.
Thanks for the kind words. Hopefully there will be no drama and subsequent fund-raising so I can focus on writing!
ReplyDelete